TRACING THE CONCEPT OF ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) WITHIN THE INDIAN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM: A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to trace and analyze the conceptual presence of Adversity Quotient (AQ) in the context of the Indian Knowledge System (IKS). The concept of Adversity Quotient (AQ) in modern psychology given by Dr. Paul G. Stoltz (1997) is considered an important indicator of human mental capacity to cope with adversity. This study attempts to determine the conceptual similarities between the ‘CORE’ dimensions of AQ in the Indian Knowledge system. The methodology of this study is qualitative and analytical in nature. This study presents a theoretical and conceptual analysis based on existing research, books, and journal articles related to IKS and AQ, rather than direct scriptural analysis. Taking the four ‘CORE’ dimensions of AQ—Control, Ownership, Reach, and Endurance—as an analytical framework—they have been comparable to modern research-based interpretations of the Vedas, Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita, and related philosophical traditions like Buddhist and Yoga philosophy. In particular, the connection of Indian knowledge with the main components of AQ has been explored through concepts such as Svadharma, Viveka and Titiksha. The results indicate that the Adversity Quotient is a new term in the contemporary psychology, but its core components are already ingrained in the Indian knowledge system since ancient years. This conceptual similarity creates a meaningful bridge between ancient wisdom, Indian Knowledge System and modern psychological thought, which can play an important role in developing mental states, resilience, and self-improvement in the face of adversity in contemporary life.